Best Techniques for Control of Limited Access in the Organization
Keywords:
cybersecurity, Privileged Access Management (PAM), least privilege, insider threatAbstract
Least privilege ensures that users have only the access necessary for their roles, therefore reducing the possibility of misuse or unintended exposure. By granting rights based on job duties, role-based access control limits access and hence lessens dependency on individual privileged accounts. Multi-factor authentication improves security and makes unwelcome access much more difficult. Session monitoring provides instantaneous user activity data that let companies see and respond quickly to suspected behavior. Regular audits and privileged account periodic reviews also ensure adherence to evolving security policies and help to find any unnecessary or high-risk permissions. Following these best practices helps to improve the security of privileged accounts & promotes the corporate accountability. By means of proactive managements & the control of privileged access, companies may lower the potential attack surfaces, lower insider risks & guard valuable assets from invasions. Maintaining a strong security framework in a gradually digital organizations environment depends on a multifarious, comprehensive approaches for privileged access control being implemented.
References
1. Barker, E., & Barker, W. (2018). Recommendation for key management, part 2: best practices for key management organization (No. NIST Special Publication (SP) 800-57 Part 2 Rev. 1 (Draft)). National Institute of Standards and Technology.
2. Epstein, M. J. (2018). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental and economic impacts. Routledge.
3. Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An organization and management perspective. Journal of business and psychology, 25, 211-223.
4. Schweyer, A. (2010). Talent management systems: Best practices in technology solutions for recruitment, retention and workforce planning. John Wiley & Sons.
5. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge‐sharing communities of practice. Journal of knowledge management, 7(1), 64-77.
6. Stoneburner, G., Goguen, A., & Feringa, A. (2002). Risk management guide for information technology systems. Nist special publication, 800(30), 800-30.
7. Hunt, C. B., & Auster, E. R. (1990). Proactive environmental management: avoiding the toxic trap. MIT Sloan Management Review, 31(2), 7.
8. Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of knowledge management, 5(1), 68-75.
9. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
10. Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: Doing the most good for your company and your cause. John Wiley & Sons.
11. Victorian Stormwater Committee. (1999). Urban stormwater: best-practice environmental management guidelines. CSIRO publishing.
12. O’dell, C. (1998). If Only We Knew What We Know: the Transfer of Internal Knowledge and Best Practice. The Free Press.
13. Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Rhodes, A., Annane, D., Gerlach, H., Opal, S. M., ... & Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup. (2013). Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Critical care medicine, 41(2), 580-637.
14. Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7(2), 211-223.
15. Krafzig, D., Banke, K., & Slama, D. (2005). Enterprise SOA: service-oriented architecture best practices. Prentice Hall Professional.
16. Gade, K. R. (2020). Data Mesh Architecture: A Scalable and Resilient Approach to Data Management. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
17. Gade, K. R. (2020). Data Analytics: Data Privacy, Data Ethics, Data Monetization. MZ Computing Journal, 1(1).
18. Immaneni, J. (2020). Cloud Migration for Fintech: How Kubernetes Enables Multi-Cloud Success. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
19. Boda, V. V. R., & Immaneni, J. (2019). Streamlining FinTech Operations: The Power of SysOps and Smart Automation. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
20. Nookala, G., Gade, K. R., Dulam, N., & Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Automating ETL Processes in Modern Cloud Data Warehouses Using AI. MZ Computing Journal, 1(2).
21. Nookala, G., Gade, K. R., Dulam, N., & Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Data Virtualization as an Alternative to Traditional Data Warehousing: Use Cases and Challenges. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
22. Katari, A. (2019). ETL for Real-Time Financial Analytics: Architectures and Challenges. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
23. Katari, A. (2019). Data Quality Management in Financial ETL Processes: Techniques and Best Practices. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
24. Komandla, V. Enhancing Security and Fraud Prevention in Fintech: Comprehensive Strategies for Secure Online Account Opening.
25. Komandla, V. Transforming Financial Interactions: Best Practices for Mobile Banking App Design and Functionality to Boost User Engagement and Satisfaction.
26. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Large Scale Migrations: Lessons Learned from EDI Projects. Journal of Innovative Technologies, 3(1).
27. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Enhancing Data Compliance in EDI Transactions. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
28. Nookala, G., Gade, K. R., Dulam, N., & Thumburu, S. K. R. (2019). End-to-End Encryption in Enterprise Data Systems: Trends and Implementation Challenges. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 5(1).
29. Gade, K. R. (2017). Integrations: ETL/ELT, Data Integration Challenges, Integration Patterns. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
30. Gade, K. R. (2017). Migrations: Challenges and Best Practices for Migrating Legacy Systems to Cloud-Based Platforms. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 3(1).
31. Babulal Shaik. Network Isolation Techniques in Multi-Tenant EKS Clusters. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, July 2020
32. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Real-Time Data Processing: A Deep Dive into Frameworks Like Apache Kafka and Apache Pulsar. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, July 2019
33. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar, and Karthik Allam. “Data Lakes Vs. Data Warehouses: Comparative Analysis on When to Use Each, With Case Studies Illustrating Successful Implementations”. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Sept. 2019
34. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Data Modeling Best Practices: Techniques for Designing Adaptable Schemas That Enhance Performance and Usability. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Dec. 2019
35. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar. Batch Vs. Stream Processing: In-Depth Comparison of Technologies, With Insights on Selecting the Right Approach for Specific Use Cases. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, Feb. 2020
36. Muneer Ahmed Salamkar, and Karthik Allam. Data Integration Techniques: Exploring Tools and Methodologies for Harmonizing Data across Diverse Systems and Sources. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, June 2020
37. Naresh Dulam. Machine Learning on Kubernetes: Scaling AI Workloads . Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Sept. 2016, pp. 50-70
38. Naresh Dulam. Data Lakes Vs Data Warehouses: What’s Right for Your Business?. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 2, Nov. 2016, pp. 71-94
39. Naresh Dulam, et al. Kubernetes Gains Traction: Orchestrating Data Workloads. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 3, May 2017, pp. 69-93
40. Naresh Dulam, et al. Apache Arrow: Optimizing Data Interchange in Big Data Systems. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 3, Oct. 2017, pp. 93-114
41. Naresh Dulam, and Venkataramana Gosukonda. Event-Driven Architectures With Apache Kafka and Kubernetes. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 3, Oct. 2017, pp. 115-36
42. Sarbaree Mishra, et al. Improving the ETL Process through Declarative Transformation Languages. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, June 2019
43. Sarbaree Mishra. A Novel Weight Normalization Technique to Improve Generative Adversarial Network Training. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 5, Sept. 2019
44. Sarbaree Mishra. “Moving Data Warehousing and Analytics to the Cloud to Improve Scalability, Performance and Cost-Efficiency”. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, Feb. 2020
45. Sarbaree Mishra, et al. “Training AI Models on Sensitive Data - the Federated Learning Approach”. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, Apr. 2020
46. Sarbaree Mishra. “Automating the Data Integration and ETL Pipelines through Machine Learning to Handle Massive Datasets in the Enterprise”. Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, vol. 6, June 2020
