Data Mesh in Use: Leading Company Case Studies
Keywords:
Data Mesh, Data Architecture, Enterprise Data, DecentralizationAbstract
Organizations have to review their data infrastructues as data grows in complexity and scale. Emerging as a transforming alternative is the Data Mesh, which supports a move from centralized data administration to a distributed, domain-centric model. According to the Data Mesh, data should be handled as a product with separate teams in charge of owning and maintaining their particular data domains rather than under the direction of a centralized data team handling all corporate data. For big companies needing help with data governance, scalability, and quality issues especially this approach is relevant. Using case studies highlighting the difficulties and achievements of implementing the Data Mesh, this paper investigates how well-known companies have embraced this architecture. This study shows how companies have handled important obstacles such data silos, variable data quality, and the complexity of managing large data sets. We investigate how teams' increased agility, improved data accessibility, and reduction of generally related limitations of a conventional centralized architecture have been made possible by decentralizing data ownership. These case studies show that, while using a Data Mesh calls for significant changes in both culture and technology, the advantages include better scalability, more flexible and effective data management all over the business. In the end, the Data Mesh is proving its effectiveness as a solution for companies trying to react to the needs of modern, data-centric businesses and go beyond the limits of traditional data structures.
References
1. Feigenbaum, L., Herman, I., Hongsermeier, T., Neumann, E., & Stephens, S. (2007). The semantic web in action. Scientific American, 297(6), 90-97.
2. Vlachos, I. (2015). Applying lean thinking in the food supply chains: a case study. Production Planning & Control, 26(16), 1351-1367.
3. Gansky, L. (2010). The mesh: Why the future of business is sharing. Portfolio Penguin.
4. Bakıcı, T., Almirall, E., & Wareham, J. (2013). A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona. Journal of the knowledge economy, 4, 135-148.
5. Garrido-Hidalgo, C., Hortelano, D., Roda-Sanchez, L., Olivares, T., Ruiz, M. C., & Lopez, V. (2018). IoT heterogeneous mesh network deployment for human-in-the-loop challenges towards a social and sustainable Industry 4.0. Ieee Access, 6, 28417-28437.
6. van Veen-Dirks, P., & Wijn, M. (2002). Strategic control: meshing critical success factors with the balanced scorecard. Long range planning, 35(4), 407-427.
7. Arayici, Y. (2007). An approach for real world data modelling with the 3D terrestrial laser scanner for built environment. Automation in construction, 16(6), 816-829.
8. Yang, S. Q., Chen, M., Jing, H. W., Chen, K. F., & Meng, B. (2017). A case study on large deformation failure mechanism of deep soft rock roadway in Xin'An coal mine, China. Engineering Geology, 217, 89-101.
9. Sahni, Y., Cao, J., Zhang, S., & Yang, L. (2017). Edge mesh: A new paradigm to enable distributed intelligence in internet of things. IEEE access, 5, 16441-16458.
10. Trebat, T. J. (1983). Brazil's state-owned enterprises: a case study of the state as entrepreneur (No. 45). Cambridge University Press.
11. Duening, T. N., & Click, R. L. (2005). Essentials of business process outsourcing. John Wiley & Sons.
12. Marques, J. P., Caraça, J. M., & Diz, H. (2006). How can university–industry–government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal?—the case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation, 26(4), 534-542.
13 .Bahr, M. (2006, August). Proposed routing for IEEE 802.11 s WLAN mesh networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd annual international workshop on Wireless internet (pp. 5-es).
14. Zhang, Y., Zhang, G., Chen, H., Porter, A. L., Zhu, D., & Lu, J. (2016). Topic analysis and forecasting for science, technology and innovation: Methodology with a case study focusing on big data research. Technological forecasting and social change, 105, 179-191.
15. Jaeger, J. A., Schwarz-von Raumer, H. G., Esswein, H., Müller, M., & Schmidt-Lüttmann, M. (2007). Time series of landscape fragmentation caused by transportation infrastructure and urban development: a case study from Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Ecology and Society, 12(1).
16. Gade, K. R. (2020). Data Mesh Architecture: A Scalable and Resilient Approach to Data Management. Innovative Computer Sciences Journal, 6(1).
17. Gade, K. R. (2020). Data Analytics: Data Privacy, Data Ethics, Data Monetization. MZ Computing Journal, 1(1).
18. Katari, A. Conflict Resolution Strategies in Financial Data Replication Systems.
19. Katari, A., & Rallabhandi, R. S. DELTA LAKE IN FINTECH: ENHANCING DATA LAKE RELIABILITY WITH ACID TRANSACTIONS.
20. Komandla, V. Enhancing Security and Fraud Prevention in Fintech: Comprehensive Strategies for Secure Online Account Opening.
21. Komandla, V. Transforming Financial Interactions: Best Practices for Mobile Banking App Design and Functionality to Boost User Engagement and Satisfaction.
22. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Integrating SAP with EDI: Strategies and Insights. MZ Computing Journal, 1(1).
23. Thumburu, S. K. R. (2020). Interfacing Legacy Systems with Modern EDI Solutions: Strategies and Techniques. MZ Computing Journal, 1(1).
